Your phone is about to stop being yours.

139 days until lockdown

Starting September 2026, a silent update, nonconsensually pushed by Google, will block every Android app whose developer hasn't registered with Google, signed their contract, paid up, and handed over government ID.

Every app and every device, worldwide, with no opt-out.

What Google is doing

In August 2025, Google announced ↗ a new requirement: starting September 2026, every Android app developer must register centrally with Google before their software can be installed on any device. Not just Play Store apps: all apps. This includes apps shared between friends, distributed through F-Droid ↗, built by hobbyists for personal use. Independent developers, church and community groups, and hobbyists alike will all be frozen out of being able to develop and distribute their software.

Registration requires:

If a developer does not comply, their apps get silently blocked on every Android device worldwide.

Who this hurts

You

You bought an Android phone because Google told you it was open. You could install what you wanted, and that was the deal.

Google is now rewriting that deal, retroactively, on hardware you already own. After the update lands, you can only run software that Google has pre-approved. On your phone: your property, that you paid for.

Independent developers

A teenager's first app, a volunteer's privacy tool, or a company's confidential internal beta. It doesn't matter. After September 2026, none of these can be installed without Google's blessing.

F-Droid ↗, home to thousands of free and open-source Android apps, has called this an "existential" threat ↗. Cory Doctorow calls it "Darth Android" ↗.

Governments & civil society

Google has a documented track record ↗ of complying when authoritarian regimes demand app removals. With this program, the software that runs your country's institutions will exist at the pleasure of a single unaccountable foreign corporation.

The EFF calls ↗ app gatekeeping "an ever-expanding pathway to internet censorship."

Google's "escape hatch" is a trap door

Google says "power users" can "still install" unverified apps. Here's what that actually looks like:

  1. Delve into System Settings, find Developer Options
  2. Tap the build number seven times to enable Developer Mode
  3. Dismiss scare screens about coercion
  4. Enter your PIN
  5. Restart the device
  6. Wait 24 hours
  7. Come back, dismiss more scare screens
  8. Pick "allow temporarily" (7 days) or "allow indefinitely"
  9. Confirm, again, that you understand "the risks"

Nine steps. A mandatory 24-hour cooling-off period. For installing software on a device you own.

Worse: this flow runs entirely through Google Play Services, not the Android OS. Google can change it, tighten it, or kill it at any time, with no OS update required and no consent needed. And as of today, it hasn't shipped in any beta, preview, or canary build. It exists only as a blog post and some mockups.

This is bigger than Android

If Google can retroactively lock down billions of devices that were sold as open platforms, every hardware manufacturer on the planet is watching.

The principle being established: the company that made your device gets to decide, after you've bought it, what software you're allowed to run. In software, this is called a "rug pull"; but at least you could always install competing software. In hardware, it is a fait accompli that strips you of your agency and renders you powerless to the whims of a single unaccountable gatekeeper and convicted monopolist.

Android's openness was never just a feature. It was the promise that distinguished it from iPhone. Millions chose Android for exactly that reason. Google is now revoking that promise unilaterally, on devices already in people's pockets, because they've decided they have enough market dominance and regulatory capture to get away with it.

Ars Technica ↗: "Google's Apple envy threatens to dismantle Android's open legacy."

But wait, isn't this...

"...just about security?"

The security rationale is a smokescreen. Google Play Protect already scans for malware independent of developer identity. Requiring a government ID doesn't make code safer. It makes developers identifiable and controllable. Malware authors can register. Indie developers and dissidents often can't. The EFF ↗ is blunt: identity-based gatekeeping is a censorship tool, not a security one.

"...still sideloading if you use the advanced flow?"

Nine steps, 24-hour wait, buried in Developer Options, delivered through a proprietary service that Google can revoke whenever they want. That's not sideloading. That's a deterrence mechanism built to ensure almost nobody completes it. And since it runs through Play Services rather than the OS, Google can tighten or kill it silently.

"...only a problem if you have something to hide?"

Whistleblowers, journalists, and activists under authoritarian governments will be the first victims. People in domestic abuse situations are next. All these groups have legitimate reasons to distribute or use software without putting their legal identity in a Google database. Anonymous open-source contribution is a tradition older than Google itself. This policy ends it on Android.

"...the same thing Apple does?"

Apple has been a walled garden from day one. People chose Android because it was different. "Apple does it too" is a race to the bottom and a weak tu quoque argument. And under regulatory pressure (the EU's Digital Markets Act), even Apple is being forced to open up. Google is moving in the opposite direction: attempting to further entrench its gatekeeping status.

"...just $25 and some paperwork?"

Maybe, if you're a developer in the US with a credit card and a driver's license. Try being a student in sub-Saharan Africa, or a dissident in Myanmar, or a volunteer maintaining a community health app. The cost isn't only financial: you're surrendering government ID and evidence or your signing keys to a company that routinely complies ↗ with government demands to remove apps and expose developers.

Fight back

Everyone

Developers

Do not sign up. Don't join the program by signing up for the Android Developer Console and agreeing to their irrevocable Terms and Conditions. Don't verify your identity. Don't play ball.

Google's plan only works if developers comply. Don't.

Google employees

If you know something about the program's technical implementation or internal rationale, contact tips@keepandroidopen.org from a non-work machine and a non-Gmail account. Strict confidence guaranteed.

All those opposed…

66 organizations from 21 countries have signed the open letter

Brave brave.com The Free Software Foundation (FSF) fsf.org The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) ccc.de VideoLAN videolan.org La Quadrature du Net laquadrature.net Open Rights Group (ORG) openrightsgroup.org FULU Foundation fulu.org IzzyOnDroid izzyondroid.org The Calyx Institute calyx.org Technopolice Bruxelles technopolice.be Fedimedia fedimedia.it /e/ Foundation e.foundation Forbrukerrådet forbrukerradet.no FUTO futo.org April april.org Rossmann Group rossmanngroup.com Associação Nacional para o Software Livre (ANSOL) ansol.org The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) eff.org The Tor Project torproject.org JMP.chat jmp.chat Digital Rights Watch digitalrightswatch.org.au Fastmail fastmail.com Rocky Linux rockylinux.org OpenMedia openmedia.org Privacy Guides privacyguides.org AdGuard adguard.com LineageOS lineageos.org CryptPad cryptpad.org KDE e.V. kde.org The Center for Digital Progress (D64) d-64.org Codeberg e.V. codeberg.org ARTICLE 19 article19.org European Digital Rights (EDRi) edri.org Software Liberty Association of Taiwan slat.org.tw Molly molly.im F-Droid f-droid.org OW2 ow2.org Proton AG proton.me Digitale Gesellschaft digitale-gesellschaft.ch Italian Linux Society ils.org Fundación Karisma karisma.org.co The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) fsfe.org epicenter.works – for digital rights epicenter.works Open Web Advocacy open-web-advocacy.org Tuta Mail tuta.com Aurora Store auroraoss.com Nextcloud nextcloud.com Techlore techlore.tech Cryptee crypt.ee The OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF) osmfoundation.org Vivaldi Technologies AS vivaldi.com MetaBrainz Foundation metabrainz.org Ghostery ghostery.com GrapheneOS Foundation grapheneos.org The Digital Rights Foundation digitalrightsfoundation.pk Software Freedom Conservancy sfconservancy.org GNOME Foundation gnome.org FOSDEM fosdem.org Osservatorio Nessuno OdV osservatorionessuno.org The Guardian Project guardianproject.info The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) beuc.eu Data Rights datarights.ngo microG microg.org Unified Push unifiedpush.org The App Fair Project appfair.org Obtainium obtainium.imranr.dev

Read the full open letter and thank the signatories →

What they're saying

Tech press

"Google's new developer rules could threaten sideloading and F-Droid's future"

Gizmochina ↗

"Google says it's making Android sideloading 'high-friction' to better warn users about potential risks"

XDA Developers ↗

"Google's Android developer verification program draws pushback"

InfoWorld ↗

"We all know that's a load of bullshit. Adding a goddamn 24-hour waiting period is batshit insanity."

Thom Holwerda, OSnews ↗

"F-Droid says Google's new sideloading restrictions will kill the project"

Ars Technica ↗

"Keep Android Open"

Linux Magazine ↗

"Google plans to block side-loading like Apple, declaring war on Android freedom"

Tuta Blog ↗

"Google's dev registration plan 'will end the F-Droid project'"

The Register ↗

"Google will require developer verification for Android apps outside the Play Store"

TechCrunch ↗

"Open letter warns mandatory registration 'threatens innovation, competition, privacy and user freedom'"

Infosecurity Magazine ↗

"Google's New Developer Rules Threaten to End the F-Droid Open-Source App Store"

How-To Geek ↗

"Keep Android Open – Abwehr gegen Verbot anonymer Apps von Google"

heise online ↗

"Android Security or Vendor Lock-In? Google's New Sideloading Rules Smell Fishy"

It's FOSS News ↗

"This will wipe out Android as an actual alternative to Apple's mobile OS offerings."

Hackaday ↗

"Google's New Developer ID Rule Could Harm F-Droid"

Reclaim The Net ↗

"Google's Attack on Sideloading Will Rob Android of One of Its Best Features"

How-To Geek ↗

"Open-Source Android Apps Threatened by Google's New Policy"

Datamation ↗

"Google's Requirement For All Android Developers To Register And Be Verified Threatens To Close Down Open Source App Store F-Droid"

Techdirt ↗

"F-Droid Says Google Is Lying About the Future of Sideloading on Android"

How-To Geek ↗

"Sideloading is dead for all intents and purposes. The Android you know and love is slowly disappearing."

Android Police ↗

"Over 67 groups urge the company to drop ID checks for apps distributed outside Play"

The Register ↗

"Google's new ID requirements could destroy independent app stores"

TechSpot ↗

"Google kneecaps indie Android devs, forces them to register"

The Register ↗

"I've been an Android user for almost 15 years -- and Google's sideloading changes are pushing me back to iPhone"

Tom's Guide ↗

"F-Droid Slams Google for Misleading Users About Android's App Verification"

Android Headlines ↗

"F-Droid project threatened by Google's new dev registration rules"

Bleeping Computer ↗

"Open-Source Android Apps at Risk Under Google's New Decree"

TechRepublic ↗

"Google will require developer verification to install Android apps, including sideloading"

9to5Google ↗

"Google will verify Android developers distributing apps outside the Play store"

The Verge ↗

"Google's developer registration 'decree' means the end for alternative app stores"

Cybernews ↗

"Google Clamps down On Android's Openness"

Internet Freedom Foundation (India) ↗

"It effectively makes the Play Store a monopoly without actually mandating that it is a monopoly."

I-Programmer ↗

"Resistance to Google's Android verification grows among developers"

Techzine EU ↗

"Google will make you wait 24 hours to sideload Android apps"

How-To Geek ↗

"Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move yet"

MakeUseOf ↗

"'Keep Android Open' Movement Challenges Google's Developer Verification Rule"

Open Source For U ↗

"Google is restricting one of Android's most important features, and users are outraged"

SlashGear ↗

"Google's Apple envy threatens to dismantle Android's open legacy"

Ars Technica ↗

"Android, Epic, and What's Really Behind Google's 'Existential' Threat to F-Droid"

Slashdot ↗

"Sideloading on Android? Soon It'll Be Like a TSA Check for Apps"

Android Headlines ↗

"An 'existential' threat to alternative app stores"

The New Stack ↗

Editorials & analysis

Organizations & open letters

"Nearly 50 organizations published an open letter opposing what they characterize as a 'kill switch for the open ecosystem.'"

Tech-ish Kenya ↗

"Google is turning Android into a walled garden monopoly. We must prevent it."

Osservatorio Nessuno ↗

"When you set up a gate, you invite authorities to use it to block things they don't like. And when you build a database, you invite governments to try to get access."

Electronic Frontier Foundation ↗

"This invasion of privacy of developers is not just an overreach of Google's authority over Android, but also jeopardizes developer safety."

Software Freedom Conservancy ↗

"Forcing software creators into a centralized registration scheme is as egregious as forcing writers and artists to register with a central authority."

F-Droid ↗

"Google's abusive approach to the Android operating system has only gotten worse in recent years. Software freedom is sorely lacking in the 'computers in our pockets' we call cell phones."

Free Software Foundation ↗

"Your Smartphone, Their Rules: How App Stores Enable Corporate-Government Censorship."

ACLU ↗

"Changes would impose barriers to entry for individual developers, small teams and volunteer projects by imposing fees, identity checks and terms that may not align with the principles of an open ecosystem."

Infosecurity Magazine ↗

"If it were to be put into effect, the developer registration decree will end the F-Droid project and other free/open source app distribution sources as we know them today."

F-Droid ↗

"We unequivocally advise against signing up for this program, now or ever."

F-Droid Open Letter ↗

"This extends Google's gatekeeping authority beyond its own marketplace into distribution channels where it has no legitimate operational role."

Open letter, over 67 signatory organizations ↗

"Developers who choose not to use Google's services should not be forced to register with, and submit to the judgement of, Google."

Open letter, over 67 signatory organizations ↗

"Google Play itself has repeatedly hosted malware, proving that corporate gatekeeping doesn't guarantee user protection."

F-Droid ↗

"Centralised, intransparent security architectures certainly help secure monetization and the market by locking out competitors."

Nextcloud ↗

YouTubers & creators

"That's not openness. That is control."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube ↗

"This is an iPhone now. I didn't want to buy an iPhone. I use Android because it gives me freedom. If you are not going to give me freedom with my computer, then why would I buy your stuff anymore?"

Louis Rossmann – YouTube ↗

"The fact of the matter is, this is my device. I paid a lot of money for it. I should be able to do with it what I want."

Switched to Linux – YouTube ↗

"Google isn't testing this in the US or Europe first. They're starting in countries like Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. Why? Because these are massive growth markets where regulation is weaker. By the time regulators catch up, the damage will already be done."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube ↗

"If I'm going to be trapped in a walled garden anyway, I'll take the one that's built properly."

fireborn – Blog ↗

"This means you can't sideload an app from an unofficial source. But it could also be used to lock the ecosystem so we're forced to install only Google apps on approved Google OS versions."

Rob Braxman Tech – Locals ↗

"Google keeps getting in as much trouble as Apple when Google is half evil and Apple is full evil. So there are probably people inside Google saying, 'Why not just go full evil?'"

Louis Rossmann – YouTube ↗

"Every single time a company takes away your ability to do what you want with what you bought and paid for, every single time they twist a knife, we have to point it out."

Louis Rossmann – YouTube ↗

"A world where two tech companies from the same city that dominate all of our mobile devices both require centralized developer registration is a world with one more lever for surveillance, one more checkpoint for censorship."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

"This represents the last real safe place for free and open-source software in the entire mobile ecosystem. Once it's gone, it's gone. And we're going to spend the next decade trying to claw it back."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

"I'm not using the word 'phone.' I'm using the word 'computer.' This has over 8 GB of RAM, a terabyte of storage. It's a computer. And I'm also not going to be using words like 'sideload.' When you download an exe file onto your Windows computer, you've installed an application. You haven't 'sideloaded' something."

Louis Rossmann – YouTube ↗

"The widely-circulated narrative that Google already backed down from this is false. They didn't, and that misunderstanding may be the most dangerous part of the story right now."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

"Android has become what they set out to destroy."

Linus Sebastian, LMG Clips – YouTube ↗

"F-Droid is basically saying that the new Google developer registration process will likely kill the open-source app store entirely."

The Linux Experiment – YouTube ↗

"Google is removing the one key advantage Android has over iOS."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube ↗

"Google has been carefully watching from the sidelines to see what exactly it is that Apple can get away with."

Linus Sebastian, LMG Clips – YouTube ↗

"Imagine Dell told you that you could no longer install any operating system other than Windows on your laptop. That's what Google is doing to your phone."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube ↗

"Developers of privacy-focused tools and emulators will have to dox themselves, making them vulnerable to government agencies or legal action."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube ↗

"Your device, their rules. The phone you bought and paid for is no longer really yours."

Tuta Blog – Blog ↗

"I have really no more strong reason to not recommend you all get iPhones, because this just is pretty much an iPhone with a Google logo on it at this point."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

"This has obvious problems for non-Google operating systems like iodeOS, LineageOS, or BraxOS. Google Android will 'check in' with Google to verify the identity of the app and to validate the operating system."

Rob Braxman Tech – Locals ↗

"Google is doing to Android what Microsoft once tried to do to the web. Embrace, extend, extinguish. Just wrapped in a shinier open-source package."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube ↗

"Follow the money. Google makes money when apps are downloaded from its store. Google has completely forgotten about its earlier company motto: Don't be evil."

Tuta Blog – Blog ↗

"Google already can disable malware that they find on your device. It's already a built-in feature. So what is developer registration actually adding here? Is it security or control? You decide."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

"When you download applications, you've simply installed an application. I don't want to use words like 'sideload.'"

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube ↗

"Google decides what's safe for you, and you don't get a say."

fireborn – Blog ↗

"Google is setting a requirement that only they can fulfill, forcing developers to go through Google and killing off thousands of apps. Countless users stranded."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

Developers & community

"Software gatekeeping is a threat to human rights. Just recently an app to track ICE was banned from the iOS app store even though this should clearly be protected first amendment speech."

gthing, Reddit ↗

"My Pixel 6 just broke, and after 15 years of using Android, I've finally been convinced to move to iOS. If I must live in a walled garden, I suppose I'll choose the one with nicer flowers."

yonato, Hacker News ↗

"Years ago, I wondered how Google would try to get away with locking down Android and shutting the cage door after capturing such a large dependent user base. Now I see how they are trying to get away with it."

chaznabin, Reddit ↗

"Antitrust action is badly needed. It is ridiculous that I need permission from my device manufacturer to install software on hardware I own."

jim201, Hacker News ↗

"Signal, VPNs -- they'll have a list of everyone opting out of government-mandated backdoors."

Max-P, Lemmy ↗

"Requiring a government ID to distribute software. Holy shit. If you are a kid and want to create a game for your friends, you better get that birth certificate ready!"

llitz, Reddit ↗

"Google has no right to be my parent. As long as I can't reject paternalism, I don't believe for a second this is done with the well-being of scam victims as the main priority."

gspr, Lobsters ↗

"This is a war on users that want to keep control of their phones and when it's done, you will not be able to escape the enshittification."

ikidd, Lemmy ↗

"I still remember how in the early days of Android vs iOS discussions, the main point was 'but it's OPEN!' The word 'open' was used as a comma by Google people. It was The Thing. The Difference. Good vs Evil and all that."

jwr, Hacker News ↗

"Google's plan to require developer verification would give Google and governments the ability to ban any app."

Zak, Hacker News ↗

"Give me liberty or give me Symbian."

masterofn001, Lemmy ↗

"We need to start treating phones differently. We're entering a world where we can't choose what we run on them. Their primary purpose is to gather data on us and serve us advertising, they're engineered for addiction, yet engaging in the world is immensely difficult without one."

specproc, Hacker News ↗

"It took them 17 years to finally pull the cage all the way shut."

Apocryphon, Hacker News ↗

"Android was never actually open and now they are abandoning even the thin pretense."

Tiraon, Tildes ↗

"'Sideload' is like 'jaywalking'; seeks to stigmatize humans being human."

tejtm, Hacker News ↗

"Google's own Play Store had over 600 million malware downloads. They keep talking about 'security' but their own store is crawling with fake apps and straight up malware while actual useful stuff gets buried or rejected."

Historical-Employ129 (324 upvotes), Reddit ↗

"The war on General Purpose Computing is the death of innovation and a direct attack on digital freedom."

layfellow, Hacker News ↗

"If the likes of Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and others have their way, you will not own your computer; those companies will effectively own your computers."

RUs1729, Slashdot ↗

"The open Android I knew and loved is long gone."

girvo, Hacker News ↗

"Twice I have had to deal with Google silently disabling my drone app to the point I had to buy an older phone to perform work. When I purchase a device that works with another device, under no circumstances should I be at the mercy of any updates they make."

cbrophoto (drone professional), Reddit ↗

"For 'security' -- always security with these assholes. They're just building the walls of the walled garden higher."

lynxy, Tildes ↗

"Once deployed, there's a near 100% chance of such a mechanism being used for evil."

Zak, Lemmy ↗

"This isn't just a competition between app stores; it's a struggle for choice and dignity. Your phone shouldn't be a cage carefully constructed by others, but an extension of your own will."

renshijian, Hacker News ↗

"I buy a device with my own money, which I supposedly then own, but then I need to ask some corporation permission to use it."

askonomm, Hacker News ↗

"Play store is full of scam apps, F-Droid isn't, but Play Store is considered secure. It's all theatre."

gcupc, Lobsters ↗

"It's not cyclic. It's a ratchet and it gets tighter and tighter."

BenjaminRi, Lobsters ↗

"Google wants the authority of a gatekeeper without the overhead of human accountability."

afferi300rina, Hacker News ↗

"You have no right telling me what I can and cannot run on my own devices."

MrZander, Hacker News ↗

"Making it harder makes it harder to treat ourselves. Software like AndroidAPS is unique. It's hard to find or very expensive and inferior in the proprietary market."

pimeys (diabetic user on life-critical medical software), Lobsters ↗

"You are essentially a child to them. The difference is society has decided not to step in to protect you from your abusive parents."

globular-toast, Hacker News ↗

"If I go down this path, I will stop all development on Android. I implore all other developers to resist this. This will completely lock down the platform forever, there will be no going back."

BatteryMountain, Hacker News ↗

"Some time in the future, we will look back to this era and ask ourselves what went wrong."

BenjaminRi, Lobsters ↗

"The fundamental problem is that we are relying on the good graces of Google to keep Android open, despite the fact that it often runs contrary to their goals as a $4T for-profit behemoth. The 'don't be evil' days are very far behind us."

paxys, Hacker News ↗

"Any time someone puts a lock on something that belongs to you, and won't give you a key, they're not doing it for your benefit."

vord (quoting Cory Doctorow), Tildes ↗

"Google now has a flag on my phone they can control remotely to keep me from accessing the apps I want."

vala, Lemmy ↗

"If your country is ever in the crosshairs of 'American interests' and bears the brunt of its sanctions, it is possible that you cannot install apps from your fellow citizens. Your own local government, bank, and store apps."

devsda, Hacker News ↗

"I hate this so much. More and more I get the feeling I have no control over the devices I own. My fear is that Windows will eventually follow. For security reasons of course. It's the path we're on now."

cheesyvoetjes, Reddit ↗

"They have stolen a free product and are now actively locking out the people who built it."

TheTearMiser, Lemmy ↗

"They're boiling the frog -- slowly removing features until all choice is gone."

hn92726819, Hacker News ↗

"Anyone else thinking this looks like a precursor to banning Signal and similar? 1) Put Google in control of what you can install. 2) Get Google to block it."

harry8, Hacker News ↗

"After 15 years of professional development on Android I too am now thinking about switching my focus to something different. And it sucks."

MrDresden, Hacker News ↗

"Google selling Android as both open source and open to running any software you like in order to quickly gain market share, only to break those promises after driving competing platforms out of the market is nothing more than fraud."

GeekyBear, Hacker News ↗

"Google seems to actively hate people who develop for their platforms."

hbn, Hacker News ↗

"Computing is infrastructure. Personal computers are a means of expressing agency. This is like banning people from moving furniture around their house without approval from mortgage lenders."

wervenyt, Tildes ↗

"Modern life practically forces you to put all your eggs into a phone controlled by one of two profit-seeking companies."

koala, Lobsters ↗

Voci dalla petizione

"I chose Android because it was open. I don’t want Google deciding what software I’m allowed to install on a device I paid for. "

Mohamad Khair, change.org ↗

"If Google decides to turn Android into a closed system I will just start using Apple instead. "

Luiz, change.org ↗

"Da quasi due anni uso con soddisfazione GrapheneOS. È uno strumento valido, libero, sviluppato da volontari. /Mutatis mutandis/ è uno dei Linux dei cellulari. Supportate anche Voi questa petizione! "

Luca, change.org ↗

"I bought the phone. I decide what I can install onto it. "

Evan, change.org ↗

"Si hacen esto, será mejor cambiarnos a iPhone "

Alex, change.org ↗

"I like android. I don't wan "

Luke, change.org ↗

"i dont want google to become a monopoly "

gosha, change.org ↗

"Without sideloading I really don't know why I would stick with android/Google. "

Josiah, change.org ↗

"My device is mine, not a pu lic service I access. "

Carter, change.org ↗

"I like owning what I pay for. "

Kullin, change.org ↗

"I AGREE BECAUSE I JUST DOOOO!! "

Anthony, change.org ↗

"I hate corporate greed "

Zach, change.org ↗

"My device, my choice. Get lost Google. If I wanted a "walled garden", I could think of a better place to go. "

Zac, change.org ↗

"I wanna install anything I want "

Macintosh, change.org ↗

"I like freedom :) "

XNotToails143X, change.org ↗

"i just wanna play angry birds star wars 2 again... "

Gustavo, change.org ↗

"I've only used android because I could install third party apps. "

Toby, change.org ↗

"Se google chiuderà android come apple, non compreremo né io né la mia famiglia né i miei amici piu smartphone android in futuro "

Marco, change.org ↗

""Android'in en büyük gücü her zaman açık olmasıydı: İstediğimiz uygulamayı sideload edip yükleyebilmek, bağımsız geliştiricilerin özgürce app yayınlayabilmesi, F-Droid gibi alternatif mağazalar... Google'ın 2026'daki zorunlu kimlik doğrulama + kayıt dayatmasıyla bu özgürlük bitiyor. Devlet kimliği vermek, ücret ödemek, her app'i Google'a bildirmek zorunda kalmak kabul edilemez! Bu, Android'i iOS gibi kapalı bir kutuya çevirmek demek. Bağımsız geliştiriciler, hobici coder'lar, gizlilik odaklı kullanıcılar hepsi zarar görecek. Lütfen Google geri adım atsın, Android'i açık tutalım! İmza veren herkese teşekkürler, sesimizi yükseltelim ✊ #KeepAndroidOpen" "

Özen Can, change.org ↗

"Preferisco Android perché è una sistema aperto e mi permette di utilizzare applicazioni sviluppate da migliaia di straordinari sviluppatori. Molte app che utilizzo per il mio lavoro, per il controllo del cellulare, per la gestione della produttività, per l'intrattenimento sono open source e installare tramite f-droid. Chiudere il sistema Android contraddice l'etica dell'azienda e limita gli utenti che credono nell'open source e nella pluralità dei servizi. "

Gerardo, change.org ↗

"I thik that Android should keep free, 'cause I've been using a Smartphone, specially Huawei, and I just could play videogames download the APK file If I'll use again Huawei I neee that "

PABLO, change.org ↗

"Se mi bloccano gli apk sono fregato non posso più usare YouTube revanced e installare giochi craccati e diventerebbe come ios e poi per me se lo bloccano e la fine di android purtroppo😢 "

Antonio, change.org ↗

"No le quiten su esencia a android!! "

Ivan, change.org ↗

"Google deve capire che gli sviluppatori non sono di sua proprietà!!! Fate sentire la vostra voce! "

Paolo, change.org ↗

All references, editorials, press coverage, and videos →

Take Action Full resource list, regulator contacts, links for every country, and how to fight back Open Letter Read the open letter signed by organizations opposing developer verification

You bought your phone.
You should decide what runs on it.

That shouldn't require a 9-step process, a 24-hour wait, and Google's ongoing permission.

Share this page. Don't sign up. Don't let them close Android.