당신의 스마트폰이 당신의 손에서 벗어나려 합니다.

137 폐쇄까지 남은 일수

2026년 9월부터 Google이 강제로 시행하는 자동 업데이트를 통해, 개발자가 Google에 등록하지 않고 계약에 서명하거나 비용을 지불하지 않은 모든 Android 앱이 차단될 예정입니다.

전 세계 모든 앱과 모든 기기에 적용되며, 거부권은 없습니다.

Google이 하려는 일

2025년 8월, Google은 새로운 요구사항을 발표했습니다 ↗. 2026년 9월부터 모든 Android 앱은...

등록에 필요한 사항:

개발자가 이를 따르지 않을 경우, 해당 앱은 전 세계 모든 Android 기기에서 소리 없이 차단됩니다.

피해를 입는 사람들

사용자

당신은 Android가 개방형 플랫폼이라는 Google의 말을 믿고 기기를 구매했습니다. 원하는 앱을 직접 설치할 수 있다는 것이 그 계약 조건이었습니다.

이제 Google은 이미 소유하고 있는 하드웨어에 대해 소급 적용하여 그 계약을 수정하려 합니다. 업데이트 이후에는 Google이 사전 승인한 소프트웨어만 실행할 수 있습니다. 당신의 자산인 스마트폰에서 말입니다.

인디 개발자

10대 소년이 처음 만든 앱, 자원봉사자의 개인정보 보호 도구, 기업의 기밀 내부 베타 버전 등 무엇이든 상관없습니다. 2026년 9월 이후에는 Google의 축복 없이는 그 어떤 것도 설치할 수 없습니다.

수천 개의 자유 소프트웨어 및 오픈 소스 Android 앱의 본거지인 F-Droid ↗는 이를 존립에 대한 위협이라고 정의했습니다.

정부 및 시민 사회

Google은 권위주의 정권이 앱 삭제를 요구할 때 이에 순응해 온 기록 ↗이 있습니다.

EFF ↗는 이러한 앱 게이트키핑을 "끊임없이 확장되는 인터넷 검열의 경로"라고 부릅니다.

Google의 '비상구'는 함정입니다

Google은 '파워 유저'가 미인증 앱을 "여전히 설치"할 수 있다고 말합니다. 하지만 그 과정은 이렇습니다.

  1. 시스템 설정 깊숙이 들어가 '개발자 옵션'을 찾습니다.
  2. 빌드 번호를 일곱 번 탭하여 개발자 모드를 활성화합니다.
  3. 강압적 활성화에 대한 경고 화면을 무시합니다.
  4. PIN 번호를 입력합니다.
  5. 기기를 재부팅합니다.
  6. 24시간 동안 기다립니다.
  7. 다시 돌아와 더 많은 경고 화면을 무시합니다.
  8. '일시적 허용'(7일) 또는 '무기한 허용'을 선택합니다.
  9. '위험'을 이해했다는 사실을 다시 한번 확인합니다.

9단계의 절차, 강제적인 24시간의 대기 기간이 있습니다. 본인 소유의 기기에 소프트웨어를 설치하는 데 필요한 절차입니다.

더 심각한 점은, 이 과정이 Android OS가 아닌 Google Play 서비스를 통해 실행된다는 것입니다. Google은 OS 업데이트 없이도 사용자 동의 없이 언제든 이 과정을 변경, 강화 또는 삭제할 수 있습니다.

Android만의 문제가 아닙니다

Google이 개방형 플랫폼으로 판매된 수십억 대의 기기를 소급하여 폐쇄할 수 있다면, 지구상의 모든 하드웨어 제조사가 이를 지켜보게 될 것입니다.

확립되고 있는 원칙은 이렇습니다. '당신이 기기를 구매한 후에도 당신이 실행할 수 있는 소프트웨어를 제조사가 제한할 수 있다'는 것입니다. 소프트웨어 업계에서는 이를 '러그 풀(Rug pull)'이라고 부릅니다.

Android의 개방성은 단순한 기능이 아니라, iPhone과 차별화되는 약속이었습니다. 수백만 명이 바로 그 이유로 Android를 선택했습니다. Google은 이제 그 약속을 일방적으로 파기하려 합니다.

Ars Technica ↗: "Google의 Apple 따라하기가 Android의 개방적 유산을 해체하려 한다"

잠시만요, 이건...

"...결국 보안을 위한 것 아닌가요?"

보안 명분은 연막에 불과합니다. Google Play Protect는 개발자 신원과 관계없이 이미 악성코드를 검사하고 있습니다. 정부 ID 제출이 코드를 더 안전하게 만들지는 않습니다. 대신 개발자를 추적 가능하게 만들 뿐입니다.

"...고급 설정을 쓰면 여전히 사이드로딩이 가능하지 않나요?"

9단계의 절차, 24시간의 대기 시간, 개발자 옵션 깊숙이 숨겨진 설정, 그리고 Google이 원할 때 취소할 수 있는 독점 서비스를 통하는 것은 사이드로딩이 아닙니다. 그것은 억제 장치입니다.

"...숨길 게 있는 사람들에게만 문제 아닌가요?"

권위주의 정부 하의 내부 고발자, 저널리스트, 활동가들이 첫 번째 희생자가 될 것입니다. 가정 폭력 상황에 처한 사람들도 마찬가지입니다. 이들은 모두 Google과 정부의 신원 확인을 불신할 정당한 이유가 있습니다.

"...Apple도 똑같이 하고 있지 않나요?"

Apple은 처음부터 폐쇄적인 환경이었습니다. 사람들은 Android가 다르기 때문에 선택했습니다. "Apple도 하니까"라는 말은 하향 평준화를 정당화하는 논리일 뿐입니다.

"...겨우 25달러와 서류 몇 장 아닌가요?"

신용카드와 운전면허증이 있는 미국 개발자에게는 그럴지도 모릅니다. 하지만 사하라 이남 아프리카의 학생이나, 미얀마의 반체제 인사, 또는 지역 사회 보건 도구를 관리하는 자원봉사자에게는 불가능한 장벽이 될 수 있습니다.

함께 싸워주세요

모두를 위한 행동

개발자를 위한 행동

등록하지 마세요. Android 개발자 콘솔에 가입하거나 철회 불가능한 약관에 동의하지 마세요.

Google의 계획은 개발자들이 따를 때만 성공합니다. 거부해 주세요.

Google 직원들에게

이 프로그램의 기술적 구현이나 내부적인 부분에 대해 알고 계신다면, 비업무용 장치 및 Gmail이 아닌 계정으로 tips@keepandroidopen.org에 제보해 주세요. 모든 정보는 철저히 비밀로 유지됩니다.

인증에 반대하는 단체들

21개국의 66개 단체가 다음에 서명했습니다: 공개 서한

Technopolice Bruxelles technopolice.be Tuta Mail tuta.com MetaBrainz Foundation metabrainz.org Italian Linux Society ils.org F-Droid f-droid.org La Quadrature du Net laquadrature.net Digitale Gesellschaft digitale-gesellschaft.ch Data Rights datarights.ngo FUTO futo.org The Calyx Institute calyx.org Open Rights Group (ORG) openrightsgroup.org Vivaldi Technologies AS vivaldi.com LineageOS lineageos.org Codeberg e.V. codeberg.org JMP.chat jmp.chat Fastmail fastmail.com ARTICLE 19 article19.org AdGuard adguard.com Rocky Linux rockylinux.org April april.org The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) beuc.eu The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) eff.org CryptPad cryptpad.org Brave brave.com OpenMedia openmedia.org IzzyOnDroid izzyondroid.org Ghostery ghostery.com Digital Rights Watch digitalrightswatch.org.au Nextcloud nextcloud.com European Digital Rights (EDRi) edri.org Privacy Guides privacyguides.org The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) ccc.de GrapheneOS Foundation grapheneos.org The OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF) osmfoundation.org OW2 ow2.org Software Freedom Conservancy sfconservancy.org The Guardian Project guardianproject.info GNOME Foundation gnome.org Open Web Advocacy open-web-advocacy.org Molly molly.im Proton AG proton.me Fedimedia fedimedia.it FULU Foundation fulu.org microG microg.org Aurora Store auroraoss.com VideoLAN videolan.org Techlore techlore.tech Software Liberty Association of Taiwan slat.org.tw Osservatorio Nessuno OdV osservatorionessuno.org Fundación Karisma karisma.org.co Rossmann Group rossmanngroup.com KDE e.V. kde.org The Center for Digital Progress (D64) d-64.org epicenter.works – for digital rights epicenter.works The Tor Project torproject.org The Digital Rights Foundation digitalrightsfoundation.pk The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) fsfe.org FOSDEM fosdem.org Unified Push unifiedpush.org The Free Software Foundation (FSF) fsf.org Obtainium obtainium.imranr.dev The App Fair Project appfair.org /e/ Foundation e.foundation Associação Nacional para o Software Livre (ANSOL) ansol.org Cryptee crypt.ee Forbrukerrådet forbrukerradet.no

공개 서한 전문 읽기 및 서명한 단체 확인하기 →

사람들의 목소리

테크 전문 미디어

"F-Droid Slams Google for Misleading Users About Android's App Verification"

Android Headlines ↗

"Google plans to block side-loading like Apple, declaring war on Android freedom"

Tuta Blog ↗

"Google is restricting one of Android's most important features, and users are outraged"

SlashGear ↗

"We all know that's a load of bullshit. Adding a goddamn 24-hour waiting period is batshit insanity."

Thom Holwerda, OSnews ↗

"Google kneecaps indie Android devs, forces them to register"

The Register ↗

"F-Droid project threatened by Google's new dev registration rules"

Bleeping Computer ↗

"Google's Requirement For All Android Developers To Register And Be Verified Threatens To Close Down Open Source App Store F-Droid"

Techdirt ↗

"Open-Source Android Apps at Risk Under Google's New Decree"

TechRepublic ↗

"Google will verify Android developers distributing apps outside the Play store"

The Verge ↗

"Google says it's making Android sideloading 'high-friction' to better warn users about potential risks"

XDA Developers ↗

"'Keep Android Open' Movement Challenges Google's Developer Verification Rule"

Open Source For U ↗

"Open-Source Android Apps Threatened by Google's New Policy"

Datamation ↗

"I've been an Android user for almost 15 years -- and Google's sideloading changes are pushing me back to iPhone"

Tom's Guide ↗

"Over 67 groups urge the company to drop ID checks for apps distributed outside Play"

The Register ↗

"Google's Apple envy threatens to dismantle Android's open legacy"

Ars Technica ↗

"Google's New Developer ID Rule Could Harm F-Droid"

Reclaim The Net ↗

"Google's Attack on Sideloading Will Rob Android of One of Its Best Features"

How-To Geek ↗

"Google's dev registration plan 'will end the F-Droid project'"

The Register ↗

"Android Security or Vendor Lock-In? Google's New Sideloading Rules Smell Fishy"

It's FOSS News ↗

"Sideloading on Android? Soon It'll Be Like a TSA Check for Apps"

Android Headlines ↗

"I've been an Android user for almost 15 years -- and Google's sideloading changes are pushing me back to iPhone"

Tom's Guide ↗

"Google's new developer rules could threaten sideloading and F-Droid's future"

Gizmochina ↗

"Sideloading is dead for all intents and purposes. The Android you know and love is slowly disappearing."

Android Police ↗

"F-Droid says Google's new sideloading restrictions will kill the project"

Ars Technica ↗

"Google's new ID requirements could destroy independent app stores"

TechSpot ↗

"Google's Android developer verification program draws pushback"

InfoWorld ↗

"This will wipe out Android as an actual alternative to Apple's mobile OS offerings."

Hackaday ↗

"Google's Attack on Sideloading Will Rob Android of One of Its Best Features"

How-To Geek ↗

"Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move yet"

MakeUseOf ↗

"It effectively makes the Play Store a monopoly without actually mandating that it is a monopoly."

I-Programmer ↗

"Android, Epic, and What's Really Behind Google's 'Existential' Threat to F-Droid"

Slashdot ↗

"Google will require developer verification for Android apps outside the Play Store"

TechCrunch ↗

"Resistance to Google's Android verification grows among developers"

Techzine EU ↗

"Google's New Developer Rules Threaten to End the F-Droid Open-Source App Store"

How-To Geek ↗

"Google's developer registration 'decree' means the end for alternative app stores"

Cybernews ↗

"Google Clamps down On Android's Openness"

Internet Freedom Foundation (India) ↗

"F-Droid Says Google Is Lying About the Future of Sideloading on Android"

How-To Geek ↗

"Keep Android Open"

Linux Magazine ↗

"Android app store provider Aptoide hits Google with fresh lawsuit alleging monopoly and anticompetitive chokehold"

Benzinga ↗

"Google will make you wait 24 hours to sideload Android apps"

How-To Geek ↗

"Google will require developer verification to install Android apps, including sideloading"

9to5Google ↗

"Open letter warns mandatory registration 'threatens innovation, competition, privacy and user freedom'"

Infosecurity Magazine ↗

"Sideloading on Android? Soon It'll Be Like a TSA Check for Apps"

Android Headlines ↗

"Keep Android Open – Abwehr gegen Verbot anonymer Apps von Google"

heise online ↗

"F-Droid Says Google Is Lying About the Future of Sideloading on Android"

How-To Geek ↗

"An 'existential' threat to alternative app stores"

The New Stack ↗

사설 및 분석

단체 및 공개 서한

"Your Smartphone, Their Rules: How App Stores Enable Corporate-Government Censorship."

ACLU ↗

"Developers who choose not to use Google's services should not be forced to register with, and submit to the judgement of, Google."

Open letter, over 67 signatory organizations ↗

"Changes would impose barriers to entry for individual developers, small teams and volunteer projects by imposing fees, identity checks and terms that may not align with the principles of an open ecosystem."

Infosecurity Magazine ↗

"If it were to be put into effect, the developer registration decree will end the F-Droid project and other free/open source app distribution sources as we know them today."

F-Droid ↗

"This is a profound change, one that shatters the entire premise of the Android ecosystem, long regarded as the antithesis of the closed Apple ecosystem."

AdGuard ↗

"Nearly 50 organizations published an open letter opposing what they characterize as a 'kill switch for the open ecosystem.'"

Tech-ish Kenya ↗

"Verification just confirms who's behind the app, it doesn't guarantee clean code or rule out malicious behavior."

AdGuard ↗

"The European Pirate Party called for proportionate and transparent measures that ensure security without restricting innovation, limiting anonymity, or distorting competition."

European Pirate Party ↗

"Google's abusive approach to the Android operating system has only gotten worse in recent years. Software freedom is sorely lacking in the 'computers in our pockets' we call cell phones."

Free Software Foundation ↗

"While Android used to be praised for its freedom and independence, it will become a closed shop just like Apple."

Tuta ↗

"Remember: It's your phone, your data, your freedom. Don't let Google take it away."

Tuta ↗

"Developers who build privacy-first browsers, encrypted messaging apps, VPNs, Tor-based software or tools for journalists and activists would be required to upload government ID to Google. These developers are unlikely to trust Google and might stop developing for Android."

Brave ↗

"Google will cut off independent developers to Android if they do not register with Google first. This will kill independent platforms like F-Droid and severely impede FLOSS devs from creating apps for Android."

KDE ↗

"This extends Google's gatekeeping authority beyond its own marketplace into distribution channels where it has no legitimate operational role."

Open letter, over 67 signatory organizations ↗

"Independent software distribution on Android will now require Google's explicit permission."

AdGuard ↗

"Forcing software creators into a centralized registration scheme is as egregious as forcing writers and artists to register with a central authority."

F-Droid ↗

"Android's biggest strength has always been its openness. That's what attracted developers and users in the first place."

AdGuard ↗

"Centralised, intransparent security architectures certainly help secure monetization and the market by locking out competitors."

Nextcloud ↗

"We unequivocally advise against signing up for this program, now or ever."

F-Droid Open Letter ↗

"We are running out of time until Google becomes the gate-keeper of all users devices."

F-Droid ↗

"A centralized global registration system for Android will inevitably chill this work. Those communities are likely to drop out of developing for Android altogether."

Electronic Frontier Foundation ↗

"Unilaterally consolidating power to approve software into the hands of a single unaccountable corporation is a threat to digital sovereignty everywhere."

Nextcloud ↗

"This invasion of privacy of developers is not just an overreach of Google's authority over Android, but also jeopardizes developer safety."

Software Freedom Conservancy ↗

"Google is turning Android into a walled garden monopoly. We must prevent it."

Osservatorio Nessuno ↗

"Ultimately, Google's plan will stop you from owning your Android phone."

Tuta ↗

"For developers building tools specifically designed to protect user privacy, being forced to surrender their own personal data as a precondition for distribution is deeply contradictory."

AdGuard ↗

"Google Play itself has repeatedly hosted malware, proving that corporate gatekeeping doesn't guarantee user protection."

F-Droid ↗

"Google's developer verification policy creates a centralized database, controlled by a single corporation, containing the real-world identity of every person who writes software for Android."

Brave ↗

"A policy that forces every Android developer to hand their identity to Google, regardless of whether they use Google's services, makes Android a less-open and less-private platform."

Brave ↗

"MEP Christel Schaldemose formally questioned whether Google's mandatory central registration is compatible with the Digital Markets Act."

European Parliament ↗

"When you set up a gate, you invite authorities to use it to block things they don't like. And when you build a database, you invite governments to try to get access."

Electronic Frontier Foundation ↗

"There are governments who might very much like to know the names of the developers of those applications so that they can go after them."

Electronic Frontier Foundation ↗

유튜버 및 크리에이터

"I have really no more strong reason to not recommend you all get iPhones, because this just is pretty much an iPhone with a Google logo on it at this point."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

"Your device, their rules. The phone you bought and paid for is no longer really yours."

Tuta Blog – Blog ↗

"Google decides what's safe for you, and you don't get a say."

fireborn – Blog ↗

"Android has become what they set out to destroy."

Linus Sebastian, LMG Clips – YouTube ↗

"F-Droid is basically saying that the new Google developer registration process will likely kill the open-source app store entirely."

The Linux Experiment – YouTube ↗

"The fact of the matter is, this is my device. I paid a lot of money for it. I should be able to do with it what I want."

Switched to Linux – YouTube ↗

"Google keeps getting in as much trouble as Apple when Google is half evil and Apple is full evil. So there are probably people inside Google saying, 'Why not just go full evil?'"

Louis Rossmann – YouTube ↗

"This has obvious problems for non-Google operating systems like iodeOS, LineageOS, or BraxOS. Google Android will 'check in' with Google to verify the identity of the app and to validate the operating system."

Rob Braxman Tech – Locals ↗

"Follow the money. Google makes money when apps are downloaded from its store. Google has completely forgotten about its earlier company motto: Don't be evil."

Tuta Blog – Blog ↗

"This is an iPhone now. I didn't want to buy an iPhone. I use Android because it gives me freedom. If you are not going to give me freedom with my computer, then why would I buy your stuff anymore?"

Louis Rossmann – YouTube ↗

"The widely-circulated narrative that Google already backed down from this is false. They didn't, and that misunderstanding may be the most dangerous part of the story right now."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

"Google is doing to Android what Microsoft once tried to do to the web. Embrace, extend, extinguish. Just wrapped in a shinier open-source package."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube ↗

"If I'm going to be trapped in a walled garden anyway, I'll take the one that's built properly."

fireborn – Blog ↗

"Every single time a company takes away your ability to do what you want with what you bought and paid for, every single time they twist a knife, we have to point it out."

Louis Rossmann – YouTube ↗

"When you download applications, you've simply installed an application. I don't want to use words like 'sideload.'"

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube ↗

"A world where two tech companies from the same city that dominate all of our mobile devices both require centralized developer registration is a world with one more lever for surveillance, one more checkpoint for censorship."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

"Developers of privacy-focused tools and emulators will have to dox themselves, making them vulnerable to government agencies or legal action."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube ↗

"This means you can't sideload an app from an unofficial source. But it could also be used to lock the ecosystem so we're forced to install only Google apps on approved Google OS versions."

Rob Braxman Tech – Locals ↗

"That's not openness. That is control."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube ↗

"Imagine Dell told you that you could no longer install any operating system other than Windows on your laptop. That's what Google is doing to your phone."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube ↗

"Google is removing the one key advantage Android has over iOS."

SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube ↗

"Google has been carefully watching from the sidelines to see what exactly it is that Apple can get away with."

Linus Sebastian, LMG Clips – YouTube ↗

"Google is setting a requirement that only they can fulfill, forcing developers to go through Google and killing off thousands of apps. Countless users stranded."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

"Google already can disable malware that they find on your device. It's already a built-in feature. So what is developer registration actually adding here? Is it security or control? You decide."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

"I'm not using the word 'phone.' I'm using the word 'computer.' This has over 8 GB of RAM, a terabyte of storage. It's a computer. And I'm also not going to be using words like 'sideload.' When you download an exe file onto your Windows computer, you've installed an application. You haven't 'sideloaded' something."

Louis Rossmann – YouTube ↗

"Google isn't testing this in the US or Europe first. They're starting in countries like Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. Why? Because these are massive growth markets where regulation is weaker. By the time regulators catch up, the damage will already be done."

ChiefGyk3D – YouTube ↗

"This represents the last real safe place for free and open-source software in the entire mobile ecosystem. Once it's gone, it's gone. And we're going to spend the next decade trying to claw it back."

Techlore – YouTube ↗

개발자 및 커뮤니티

"It's not cyclic. It's a ratchet and it gets tighter and tighter."

BenjaminRi, Lobsters ↗

"It took them 17 years to finally pull the cage all the way shut."

Apocryphon, Hacker News ↗

"They're boiling the frog -- slowly removing features until all choice is gone."

hn92726819, Hacker News ↗

"Making it harder makes it harder to treat ourselves. Software like AndroidAPS is unique. It's hard to find or very expensive and inferior in the proprietary market."

pimeys (diabetic user on life-critical medical software), Lobsters ↗

"We are talking about something categorically worse than vendor lock-in: Collective vendor lock-in."

anordal, Lobsters ↗

"Modern life practically forces you to put all your eggs into a phone controlled by one of two profit-seeking companies."

koala, Lobsters ↗

"There's an entire genre of scamming where the scammers spend months building rapport with their victims before cashing out. One day is nothing."

free_bip (on the 24-hour wait defeating scammers), Hacker News ↗

"Give me liberty or give me Symbian."

masterofn001, Lemmy ↗

"Social engineering is destroyed with education, not with restriction and control. Trading freedom for safety eliminates both."

survirtual, Hacker News ↗

"Software gatekeeping is a threat to human rights. Just recently an app to track ICE was banned from the iOS app store even though this should clearly be protected first amendment speech."

gthing, Reddit ↗

"Twice I have had to deal with Google silently disabling my drone app to the point I had to buy an older phone to perform work. When I purchase a device that works with another device, under no circumstances should I be at the mercy of any updates they make."

cbrophoto (drone professional), Reddit ↗

"If I go down this path, I will stop all development on Android. I implore all other developers to resist this. This will completely lock down the platform forever, there will be no going back."

BatteryMountain, Hacker News ↗

"'Sideload' is like 'jaywalking'; seeks to stigmatize humans being human."

tejtm, Hacker News ↗

"If the likes of Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and others have their way, you will not own your computer; those companies will effectively own your computers."

RUs1729, Slashdot ↗

"Google now has a flag on my phone they can control remotely to keep me from accessing the apps I want."

vala, Lemmy ↗

"Google has no right to be my parent. As long as I can't reject paternalism, I don't believe for a second this is done with the well-being of scam victims as the main priority."

gspr, Lobsters ↗

"Any time someone puts a lock on something that belongs to you, and won't give you a key, they're not doing it for your benefit."

vord (quoting Cory Doctorow), Tildes ↗

"My Pixel 6 just broke, and after 15 years of using Android, I've finally been convinced to move to iOS. If I must live in a walled garden, I suppose I'll choose the one with nicer flowers."

yonato, Hacker News ↗

"Play store is full of scam apps, F-Droid isn't, but Play Store is considered secure. It's all theatre."

gcupc, Lobsters ↗

"Google wants the authority of a gatekeeper without the overhead of human accountability."

afferi300rina, Hacker News ↗

"Anyone else thinking this looks like a precursor to banning Signal and similar? 1) Put Google in control of what you can install. 2) Get Google to block it."

harry8, Hacker News ↗

"I still remember how in the early days of Android vs iOS discussions, the main point was 'but it's OPEN!' The word 'open' was used as a comma by Google people. It was The Thing. The Difference. Good vs Evil and all that."

jwr, Hacker News ↗

"If your country is ever in the crosshairs of 'American interests' and bears the brunt of its sanctions, it is possible that you cannot install apps from your fellow citizens. Your own local government, bank, and store apps."

devsda, Hacker News ↗

"Don't beg. Don't get in a position that freedoms depend on the whims of a corporation or willingness of a government to regulate them. Build."

jzb, Lobsters ↗

"Whatever Google is doing kind of scares me. We have a big DIY community of diabetics in Germany running tools like AndroidAPS that cannot ever be distributed through official channels."

pimeys (Type 1 diabetic, DIY medical software), Lobsters ↗

"Google's plan to require developer verification would give Google and governments the ability to ban any app."

Zak, Hacker News ↗

"All the banking and payment apps in India refuse to open if you have developer mode on."

nibbleyou (developer in India), Hacker News ↗

"Google seems to actively hate people who develop for their platforms."

hbn, Hacker News ↗

"Brazil government app refuses to operate with developer mode on."

flykespice (developer in Brazil), Hacker News ↗

"After 15 years of professional development on Android I too am now thinking about switching my focus to something different. And it sucks."

MrDresden, Hacker News ↗

"Requiring a government ID to distribute software. Holy shit. If you are a kid and want to create a game for your friends, you better get that birth certificate ready!"

llitz, Reddit ↗

"Years ago, I wondered how Google would try to get away with locking down Android and shutting the cage door after capturing such a large dependent user base. Now I see how they are trying to get away with it."

chaznabin, Reddit ↗

"It is a disgrace how Google has managed this situation. The promised 'advanced flow' hasn't appeared in any Android 16 or 17 betas. Google is quietly proceeding with the original lockdown."

fermigier, Hacker News ↗

"You are essentially a child to them. The difference is society has decided not to step in to protect you from your abusive parents."

globular-toast, Hacker News ↗

"Android was never actually open and now they are abandoning even the thin pretense."

Tiraon, Tildes ↗

"This is a war on users that want to keep control of their phones and when it's done, you will not be able to escape the enshittification."

ikidd, Lemmy ↗

"They have stolen a free product and are now actively locking out the people who built it."

TheTearMiser, Lemmy ↗

"Can't come at a worse time. People are just learning to make things through vibe coding, and they're gonna want to put their own apps on their phones. And now Google says no."

Serinus, Lemmy ↗

"If Android's sandbox and permission systems actually worked, then the mere act of installing an app from an arbitrary source would be as harmless as visiting an arbitrary website."

mwcampbell, Lobsters ↗

"I want to deploy apps on my device. They are my apps, it's my device, and I should not be required to ask for permission to do so."

fsniper, Hacker News ↗

"We need to start treating phones differently. We're entering a world where we can't choose what we run on them. Their primary purpose is to gather data on us and serve us advertising, they're engineered for addiction, yet engaging in the world is immensely difficult without one."

specproc, Hacker News ↗

"Signal, VPNs -- they'll have a list of everyone opting out of government-mandated backdoors."

Max-P, Lemmy ↗

"Google selling Android as both open source and open to running any software you like in order to quickly gain market share, only to break those promises after driving competing platforms out of the market is nothing more than fraud."

GeekyBear, Hacker News ↗

"Once deployed, there's a near 100% chance of such a mechanism being used for evil."

Zak, Lemmy ↗

"This isn't just a competition between app stores; it's a struggle for choice and dignity. Your phone shouldn't be a cage carefully constructed by others, but an extension of your own will."

renshijian, Hacker News ↗

"I teach digital literacy and 99% of unsavory software I encounter on people's phones come from the Play Store or App Store. I will believe they're serious about protecting users when I see them do something about the crap ton of borderline scam apps infesting their stores."

1995ToyotaCorolla, Lemmy ↗

"I hate this so much. More and more I get the feeling I have no control over the devices I own. My fear is that Windows will eventually follow. For security reasons of course. It's the path we're on now."

cheesyvoetjes, Reddit ↗

"The war on General Purpose Computing is the death of innovation and a direct attack on digital freedom."

layfellow, Hacker News ↗

"Some time in the future, we will look back to this era and ask ourselves what went wrong."

BenjaminRi, Lobsters ↗

"For 'security' -- always security with these assholes. They're just building the walls of the walled garden higher."

lynxy, Tildes ↗

"You have no right telling me what I can and cannot run on my own devices."

MrZander, Hacker News ↗

"Computing is infrastructure. Personal computers are a means of expressing agency. This is like banning people from moving furniture around their house without approval from mortgage lenders."

wervenyt, Tildes ↗

"Antitrust action is badly needed. It is ridiculous that I need permission from my device manufacturer to install software on hardware I own."

jim201, Hacker News ↗

"The open Android I knew and loved is long gone."

girvo, Hacker News ↗

"The fundamental problem is that we are relying on the good graces of Google to keep Android open, despite the fact that it often runs contrary to their goals as a $4T for-profit behemoth. The 'don't be evil' days are very far behind us."

paxys, Hacker News ↗

"I buy a device with my own money, which I supposedly then own, but then I need to ask some corporation permission to use it."

askonomm, Hacker News ↗

"Android is for everyone, provided they submit to Google exclusively."

gumby271, Hacker News ↗

"The phrase 'sideload' is psychological propaganda we are all best off rejecting."

WaffleMonster, Slashdot ↗

"Google's own Play Store had over 600 million malware downloads. They keep talking about 'security' but their own store is crawling with fake apps and straight up malware while actual useful stuff gets buried or rejected."

Historical-Employ129 (324 upvotes), Reddit ↗

청원 참여자들의 목소리

"I'm only using android for apk's otherwise I would be using IOS/iPhone, Also without apk's there would be no reason to keep updates going for certain developers, we would be losing one of the things that makes android what it is, That is my opinion on this whole idea from google "

JaCureon, change.org ↗

"The main reason I ditched ios was that I felt the restrictions of what kinds of apps apple felt benevolent to allow me to download was choking my experience. I'm very disappointed to see that android is just going to evolve into a cheap offbrand iPhone. ( °︵°) "

Gino, change.org ↗

"As a developer, I will NEVER give Google my ID or personal identity. They are already known to post developers home addresses on their app store publicly, which is a huge safety violation. I do not trust google and will not give them any of my personal data. "

Skye, change.org ↗

"This isn't safety, it's simply control. This hasn't been an issue for years. "

James, change.org ↗

"As a long-time Android enthusiast, I strongly oppose your push to force developer ID verification for APK sideloading. This policy erodes the open ecosystem that drew millions to Android, blocking access to legacy apps, region-locked content, and custom tools from sources like F-Droid. Under the guise of security, it stifles innovation and user freedom. Please reverse this immediately and honor Android's roots in choice and accessibility. "

Lucas, change.org ↗

"People who choose Android over Apple do so because Android offers the freedom to install apps freely and develop apps as a hobby. I think that if they remove access to APKs, I'll switch to Apple, and I think most people will do the same. "

Alexis, change.org ↗

"Android giving users choice has been the staple point of android OS. Removing choices like sideloading apps is not the move. I develop apps for myself, I do not want to be "an approved developer" I don't have time nor care for that. This action also is the beginning of censorship, and monopolization of android OS. Android started as an open operating system, you have simply turned it into a reskinned Apple OS. Your choice to go anti-consumer is going to hurt. You are not "protecting" anyone "

lucas, change.org ↗

"I use software that is not in the google play store. I want the freedom to use my phones. tablets, and other devices how I want them. "

Doug, change.org ↗

"Enough is enough google! I am already swapping back over to iOS for more than a few reasons other than oh i dont know, YOUR OWN PHONES CATCHING FIRE ON MY BEDSIDE TABLE! As a developer, This makes it really hard to want to make an app cross-compatible with your OS! First you flatten the bugdroid, then you make unsafe phones, now this?! Sorry, but even I, a hardcore android fan am taking Apple's stance on this. "

Shibe, change.org ↗

"Android is the Beacon of Freedom and Open market for many developers to create, test and use their software. Requiring Licensing and restricting this Freedom goes against the very Core of what Android stands for and was built for. It is UNACCEPTABLE for users not to be able to download whatever they want, regardless of Licensing or Approval. If Google closes this door, it will Forever Damage Android and Many users and developers like Myself will leave. There is no longer any reason to remain on Android if this happens. MY hope is that there is enough Sanity left to keep this door Open and fight to protect the Freedom of Android. Those who would give up their Freedom for Security, deserve Neither "

James, change.org ↗

"Purchasing objects means ownership. If ownership is only given to the haves, the have-nots become slaves. Google, if you are doing this of your own free will, shame on you. Governments of the world: attack evildoers directly, don't punish the populace with slavery. For one sin, all Man suffers. But we don't have to live in that slavery to sinfulness! Return hate with love! "

Jame, change.org ↗

"As an android guru who runs a blog on getting the best out of android who often recommends and personally use many side loaded apps since a lot of the best apps are on places like f droid and sinilar places but not on google. Ultimately its sad to see android and apple be these walled gardens "

L, change.org ↗

"The whole reason Android is superior to other os is because its an open platform. If you change what makes it great....then its no longer great. Its a copy cat IOS falling in line with everyone else and no longer blazing its own path. "

Michael, change.org ↗

"I didn't even know they were trying to pull this until today! This is scary and concerning as a consumer, stop limiting my freedom on my device! "

Chloe, change.org ↗

"Stop Google from limiting APK file usage! "

Daniel, change.org ↗

"Love android because its open source, you're literally killing your base and the reason why people love android. Close it down and we will all find a better solution "

Courtney, change.org ↗

"Google cannot restrict APKs. "

Ruan, change.org ↗

"Either way this is going to lead to a massive lawsuit My phone is my device Google doesn't own it nor does it have the power to tell me what I can and can't install on the device that I own Google believes that it rules the world it's censorship completely destroyed YouTube now they plan to destroy Android in the same way but $1,000 says by this time next year Google will cave to the demands of the people "

Isaiah, change.org ↗

"Eliminating side loading will remove the main competitive edge that Android has over iOS, remove the open nature that users enjoy and prevent certain use cases. "

Chris, change.org ↗

"The restriction of an end-user's ability to control what they can and cannot do with their device that they legally own is inherently malicious and should be illegal. Google is pushing and overreaching in a way that is invasive and threatening to users' privacy and freedom. "

Weston, change.org ↗

"This seems important not to let Google be the all powerful mega corp "

Adrian, change.org ↗

"We own the phones so we should be able to do whatever we want with them. Waiting a short period is not the way to do it. This feels like control and blocks. We are not kids. Please let us actually have control of our phones. "

nicholas, change.org ↗

"Removing the ability to side load apps is taking away owners right to their own devices. As one of the best phones I've owned this is disheartening. I might as well buy an iPhone "

Kamau, change.org ↗

"I really like the ability to "sideload" apps on android. Android's customization capabilities is one of it's most likable features. APK files are cool. They are the reason why my phone looks so pretty. Please continue to allow this option as I think it will be beneficial to Google, instead of forcing 3rd party developers from abandoning the platform to monotonous hegemony like that of the Apple iPhone OS store. Google building upon the open source code designed by Linus is cool and allows for input from various individuals which help inevitably make the google play store more beautiful and lively. Customization is cool. Please continue to allow APK file usage. "

Paul, change.org ↗

"Its important to me that developers aren't forced to give away personally identifiable information to any agency, private or public. Google shouldn't have the right to require you to give up your GOVERNMENT ID in order to make an app. "

Alex, change.org ↗

"It is so crazy to think I would ever think that this was the case. Android becoming IOS. I know Google wants to be Apple, but limiting supposedly open source software to now not allow true open source software seems to undermine this experiment. I will call this an experiment because you're been testing it for over a decade and now showing the true direction. Closed environment where all the data is mined and sold. Regardless of those who were here because Apple locked us into devices and software, the difference here is quality control you have none Google. You have relied on communities of users/developers to accomplish this. No More! This change unfortunately won't affect the bottom line immediately or barely when it comes to profit, but it will affect quality and choices and those are things that attract money... "

Marc, change.org ↗

"I strongly oppose this change. Google should HIGHLY reconsider this idea. It's SPECIFICALLY this freedom that makes me go with android to begin with. This freedom of choice is what separates them from Apple. If this change goes into effect you will see many users either switch to Apple, or find any possible alternatives that support these options. "

Zachary, change.org ↗

"I only choose Android because of the openness and flexibility in how I choose to use my device. Locking down Android with paid developer verification and blocking me from installing apps manually is not being open. "

Jason, change.org ↗

"If I wanted a phone that decided what I can and can't do I would have bought an iPhone. "

Tom, change.org ↗

"I like android. I don't want it to be like ios 🤮 "

Luke, change.org ↗

"The war on freedom is beginning. Let's keep fighting back. "

Rafael, change.org ↗

"the only reason Android shines is it's customizabe especially app installation. please don't ruin yourself "

John, change.org ↗

"Open source is people power "

Nathan, change.org ↗

"This is a tragedy, it won't stop bad intentions, it will only put our data at risk, and many apps will become lost media. "

Jessé, change.org ↗

"Android is supposed to be open, as a dirrect counter to Apples closed system. If you continue down this road, we will just make something else. Open source is a powerful community "

Serissa, change.org ↗

"It is and has always been important to be able to install an app. Countless times I get an app update that breaks something and I have to downgrade to the old version until it is fixed. This simple and necessary fix will not be possible if APKs are limited. "

Michael, change.org ↗

"I am concerned for my privacy with this change. I chose Android under the impression that I can customize my device in ways that can help me protect my online privacy. That's something that can't be said for Apple. The decision to change Android to a closed system is going to hurt people like me who care about online privacy. Google, You're not helping your customer base by doing this. Only making them more likely to switch to iphones or flip phones. This is not the Android I've always known, It's another platform falling into the proprietary capitalism that a significant amount of the android customer base has been trying to steer away from since the early days of smartphones. "

Patience, change.org ↗

"Our phones, our choice!!! "

Robert, change.org ↗

"Android's open platform is the only counter positioning left before it's just a shittier iPhone. Please don't hand the market to Apple. "

Jesse, change.org ↗

"I chose Android over Apple because of its openness and flexibility. I want to be the one who controls my device, not some central decision making body. "

Liana, change.org ↗

"Google is literally taking away our right. Yes we CAN bypass this with there feature allowing us to install unverified apps but making us wait 24 hours BUT they are going to give our devices a "unsafe" mark stopping banking and many other apps from working the same way they did to ROOTED phones. "

yousef, change.org ↗

"Freedom to download and install whatever you want is one of the main reasons people choose AndroidOS over apple products. With how Apple has made steps towards more sustainable hardware, it is getting less and less justifiable to continue using google products. "

Antonio, change.org ↗

"I love the freedom to use whatever program APK I wish and Appl........Google wants to take that away from us? Expect lawsuits in your future. BTW I HATE the play store, F-Droid ALL THE WAY "

David, change.org ↗

"One of the main benefits of owning an Android device is having the freedom of installing any repositories and apps you wish, including those that are open source. If Google goes through with this power grab and monopolizes the Android software, then there will be no benefit compared to owning an iPhone. "

Richard, change.org ↗

"Google doing this would not only reduce consumer rights but also create a monopoly. I do not approve of this. "

Alexis, change.org ↗

"I have advocated for android over apple for years in large part due to freedom of software and hardware choices. Ive gotten many to convert over. If google implements this change it will be a huge problem and make me and many others start considering alternative options. Google, be a pioneer and supporter of developers worldwide, not a stifler of technology and innovation. "

Emmanuel, change.org ↗

"Freedom of choice and the end users ability to load applications and make changes to their devices is exactly why I switched to Android so many years ago. Truly hoping this is resolved and back to the core android roots once again. "

Ryan, change.org ↗

"This is an authoritarian play by Google to regulate their customers (aka a huge percentage of the public) not by national law but by their own personal whims on what's "best" for their corporation and shareholders. It undermines a customer's right to modify their products how they want, and instills power to themselves to govern essentially all software that gets developed for non-iOS phones, which is highly unethical and anti-consumer. If this gets implemented I will be selling my phone and switching to a non-android product. "

Nick, change.org ↗

"Don't be like Apple "

Tom, change.org ↗

"Continue to keep our rights to open-source applications a reality for all Android users on every device and keep the option for everyone to create & install the apps they choose. Allow us to make the choice for ourselves and respect the integrity and freedom of the developers & users that love the Android. "

Mitch, change.org ↗

"https://c.org/ztGgdyG2f4 "

Rosita, change.org ↗

"The openness of the Android is its unique selling point. Keep Android open to keep Android Android. "

John, change.org ↗

"This is a spit in the face of open-source and Android's userbase. "

Mark, change.org ↗

"Sick and tired of Google's garbage. "

Gabriel, change.org ↗

"The ability to download and install APK's from any source is a choice that should not be taken from users. It's the whole reason Android OS is successful now. Taking away choice will drive users to seek out other software solutions. Keeping Android Open is important to stop corporate overeach, unnecessary tracking and selling of user data, and keeping software available and fair. "

Christopher, change.org ↗

"Let's be real, this isn't about security, it's about forcing people to use Google playstore, and trying to get peoples info just like what Youtube is doing right now. "

Draven, change.org ↗

"This is a violation of free speech and freedom of choice. We are not apple! "

Gearrard, change.org ↗

"This is despicable behavior on Googles part. I own my device, therefore I get to decide what I want to install to it. Period. End of story. Some corporate suite halfway across the country shouldn't be allowed to decide what I can install on my device. We need to stand up to this kind of abuse of power. "

Devin, change.org ↗

"This one feature is the one thing that has kept me from using iphone, if google proceeds, there will be many people like me that will make the jump because android will have nothing else to offer in comparison, this is bad for everyone not just the ones that use apps outside play store, they really want to kill android brands just like this. I hope they don't commit to this horrible anti consumer change "

Miguel, change.org ↗

"We want digital sovereignty for democracy! "

Kelly, change.org ↗

"Absolute nonsense from Google, the flexibility of the Android OS has been the only thing differentiating it from Apple products and keeping me in this ecosystem. Each "update" is just another layer of restrictions at this point. With current market prices and the state that Google is developing android, I might as well just buy a laptop instead of a flagship android. "

Pwon, change.org ↗

"This move by Google is part of a larger trend to limit freedom online and verify everything. Government ID belongs to the government only not Google, so Google has no right to demand usage of it it's not their property and it's not Google users' property either it's the government's. Making developers present this is unnecessary as code review already prevents bad actors on Google Play Store. Limiting side loading APKs is anti freedom, and anti American. When you buy a device that means you are not restricted from doing anything you wish with it. Additionally basically nobody installs something from outside the play store or other markets like Samsung so this clearly isn't a safety thing because only the people who want or need this feature seek it out, and everyone continues to benefit from the availability of open platforms because they could decide tomorrow to install a app store other than google play store to seek out cheaper apps or ones that match their ethics such as open source. Android itself is licensed as open source and inclusion of proprietary google owned code in devices is sketchy anyway. "

Jagur, change.org ↗

"Google is about to further close down Android, which isn't good at all. If anything, it's going to hurt everyone, and furthermore, what if others start to copy them and lock down their ecosystems in a similar manner? For example, what if Microsoft starts locking down Windows app dev like Google is locking down Android app dev, and starts restricting sideloading exes? "

Joshua, change.org ↗

"Google is nothing short of an evil pig! We want free android! "

James, change.org ↗

"On veut pouvoir faire ce que l'on veut quand l'on veux "

Philippe, change.org ↗

"Google,please don't do that. Because if you do that, millions and millions of Android users will switch to iOS, because that's the point of Android even exists! *I* switched to Android because I did not like iOS So please... Give us the freedom we want! "

Eduardo, change.org ↗

"we pay for these devices and maintain them. we should be able to do anything we want with them. Locking us out is just greed. Like buying a car. then having to pay ever month to use the heated seats that are already in the car. if anything, let us put a different system on the phone. "

David, change.org ↗

"I have been antagonistic towards the Google play store and its selection of poor-quality apps. By taking away the ease of sideloading apps, I might as well have bought a brick with some precious metals in it. None of us do not have to take Google's mandate. "

Nathan, change.org ↗

"If I recall IOS got sued and lost for trying to lock down options, And imagine if you had to pay a fee and show your ID just to make a windows or Linux application? No because that is stupid. and It is utterly foolish. And this isn't about security as android already has ways of locking down insecure apps already. Also this act harms open source projects and also puts developers at risk as sharing government ID's has already proven to be very insecure and would give bad actors ways of hurting people because they don't like what the person makes. "

Bradley, change.org ↗

"After this decision I will just go with iPhone, this was the only reason I was using Android, just making it worse for the consumer, this is not about security but locking down people's choice of store, which in my opinion should be illegal give that we bought our phones and we should be able to do with them as we please "

Colin, change.org ↗

"What guarantee is there that Google will use this data to make money? If only it were used for apk content bar betting houses and violent challenge. "

Waldomiro, change.org ↗

"I have been a supporter of Android since release in 2008 precisely because it is an open market. What I choose to put on hardware I own should be my decision, not a big brother acting like a babysitter. This action by Google is simply eroding my good will for them. We need to be able to do what we please with our devices. "

Anthony, change.org ↗

"Restrictions like these are a form of control lets not take away anyone's freedom of choice "

Daniel, change.org ↗

"Android used to be the go to mobile if you wanted quality and freedom from having to buy in to one type of tech (e.g. Apple). Now they're forcing developers and users to buy into their tracking. This just may well be the push I need to give up my mobile all together. Thanks Google! "

Jason, change.org ↗

"Android has always stood for freedom, openness, and user choice. Blocking APKs goes against the very spirit of what makes Android great. Users should have the right to install the apps they want, from the sources they trust, not just from one store. Limiting APKs doesn’t make Android safer; it only takes control away from users and developers alike. Keep Android open. Keep Android free.Android has always stood for freedom, openness, and user choice. Blocking APKs goes against the very spirit of what makes Android great. Users should have the right to install the apps they want, from the sources they trust, not just from one store. Limiting APKs doesn’t make Android safer; it only takes control away from users and developers alike. Keep Android open. Keep Android free. "

Pedro, change.org ↗

"What happened to not being evil? "

Scott, change.org ↗

"I dropped iOS and moved to Android when I learned the importance of freedom. If Google makes this movement I don't see what sense makes that change anymore. "

Josh, change.org ↗

"More sensorship, more control, just another step into taking away the little bits of freedom we have left in this country in the things we love doing the most. I say no thank you, go away. "

Brandon, change.org ↗

"The Google need to stop "

ghost, change.org ↗

"It's my phone that I bought with my money. Why is Google allowed to determine what apps I install on it? "

Eugene, change.org ↗

"Android must remain a free platform. Google isn't doing this for security reasons. They want to control us, but we can't let that happen. "

Luciano, change.org ↗

"Android has always been an open platform. It needs to stay an open platform. There are already security features in place to keep less experienced users from installing apps from unknown sources. There's absolutely no reason to shut out independent developers just because they don't want to give Google their money or personal information; or to keep users from installing any app that they want. "

Jose, change.org ↗

"Keep Android Open. We are not letting you form a monopoly, Google. It's OUR devices. If you continue with this, you'll remove one of the only reasons most people are not with Apple: freedom. So think about it. "

Bruno Leonel, change.org ↗

"Sideloading is genuinley the one actual reason I choose android phones over Apple. Without it, the switch is actually negligble. This is not the business decision to make. "

Leon, change.org ↗

"It's a no to big brother and feeling myself fold up when I look at my phone "

William, change.org ↗

"As a long time user of Android who has refused to move on to other mobile devices, and as a developer who builds personal apps for testing, I find the idea of removing sideloading to be more harmful for the android community than it is helpful. I do not want to be "an approved developer" by giving up my personal information and being forced to pay a fee. Android literally started as an open-source operating system, and now it's literally just Apple OS but Google edition. Plus the worry of malware being spread elsewhere is contradictory. Apps on the Google Play Store are NOTORIOUS for containing spyware, malware, and even pornographic ads. I once installed a Genesis emulator on the Google Play Store and the first thing I saw was an ad of a bunch of nude girls, and the ad literally had the Google Ads logo button on it, so I know that wasn't from them but y'all. When I installed a Genesis emulator outside of Google Play, there was not a single ad, and for the other apps I got that did have ads, thet didn't have freaking PORN ads. Going anti-consumer isn't protecting anyone Google, it's just making things worse but in your favor. Please Google, make the choice that would keep your userbase and community instead of one that would destroy it. If you are going to continue with this anti-consumer decision, I might as well switch to Apple because at least they take the time to double-check if their apps have malware and spyware. Don't make me switch. "

Elijah, change.org ↗

"Apk's are the best part of Google so � "

Nick, change.org ↗

"Ive used both IPhone and Android, and the biggest reason I stayed with android is the ability to download any app I want. While Google is allowing legit malware and scam apps onto their platform, they are attacking indie developers who are just making useful apps. This is completely against user freedom and is essentially going to just send a lot of us Apple, what is the point? This needs to stop! "

Gina, change.org ↗

"I have always stayed with Android knowing I was free to create and develop and install and control my own device without the need to root the device. This decision will make this device just as worthless to me as an apple ios device and then looking again for other alternatives. Android was not always as polished and of thr same quality and IOS but having the ability to control my own device and software meant more to me then a fully polished and responsive mobile device. "

Brad, change.org ↗

"I honestly don't understand why this even has to be petitioned for in the first place. It should be self-evident that it should be entirely up to the user what software should be installed on their own device. "

Patrick, change.org ↗

"Wow, I sure like it when the operating system touted to be for power-users to make unequivocally theirs gets shut up. If I wanted to play it "your way or the highway", I'd go to Apple. This is my device. And I don't need YOUR approval for that. "

Liam, change.org ↗

"Android being "open" is what draws a lot of people to it from the others. This effectively makes it more closed. "

Glenn, change.org ↗

"This decision makes you seem even more authoritarian and greedy than usual. Regardless, since we all know you care about your profit margins more than anything else I'd like to point out that you're depriving yourselves of potential profits. The small developers that are honing their skills developing apps that; for whatever reason; they can't or don't want to publish through you, they may create the next viral app as a result of their efforts. If you take away their ability to develop without you being in complete control you are killing potential profits. "

Caleb, change.org ↗

"Keep Android Open "

Timothy, change.org ↗

"The ability to download apps directly from developers is one of the main differentials of Android from IOS. Limiting this will severely impact the market share of Android by removing basically any reason anyone would want to use Android over IOS. "

gabriel, change.org ↗

"As a young developer, you need to stop! What you re doing will prevent anyone below the age of 18 from developing apps for their own purpose and installing on their device, which they payed for, imagine giving a toy to a kid, then putting it into a box that they can't open, that is what you are doing right now. "

Alex, change.org ↗

"Computers and modern technology was built and advanced by hobbyists who could freely develop for and modify their devices. By limiting APKs and off store software installs we are killing the innovation that built this industry. I stand with FOSS, I stand with hobbyists. "

Paul, change.org ↗

"Keep android free. "

Jansen, change.org ↗

"Freedom of expression and choice, without filtering. "

Ralph, change.org ↗

"Thie is absolutely ridiculous. Nothing but censorship and control everywhere these past several months. They'll all burn for it. "

Jeffrey, change.org ↗

모든 참고 자료, 사설, 보도 및 영상 보기 →

행동하기 전체 리소스 목록, 규제 당국 연락처, 국가별 링크 및 대응 방법 공개 서한 개발자 인증에 반대하는 단체들이 서명한 공개 서한 읽기

당신은 당신의 스마트폰을 샀습니다.
무엇을 실행할지는 당신이 결정해야 합니다.

그 결정에 9단계의 절차와 24시간의 대기, 그리고 Google의 지속적인 허락이 필요해서는 안 됩니다.

이 페이지를 공유해 주세요. 등록하지 마세요. Android가 폐쇄되도록 내버려 두지 마세요.